← Search

Logan Baxter

MILL CREEK, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
125 matches · 70W–55L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.62
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 7 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
8%
down to 3.5
92%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 5% down · 95% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.63. Higher than today’s 3.62 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 4.0
530 of 782

Logan is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Logan has been 4.0 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.54.02019202020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Logan has gone from the 37th to the 24th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.5
87%
20W–3L · 66.4% of games
4.0
53.1%
26W–23L · 51.6% of games
6.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 44% of games
7.0mixed
64.3%
9W–5L · 57.8% of games
8.0mixed
30.8%
8W–18L · 43.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history125 matches
L
Cindy Park / Mina Park
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenalyn Bush
−0.014below expectation — took 47% of games against 53% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Shubhangi Handa / Medilyn Barrett
2026-04-25 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenalyn Bush
−0.037below expectation — took 45% of games against 62% expected
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-12 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenalyn Bush
+0.007better than expected — took 71% of games against 62% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-03-08 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jinhee Park
+0.019better than expected — took 48% of games against 40% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-01-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Holly Schmidt
−0.043below expectation — took 25% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-01-04 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Caponigro
−0.011below expectation — took 28% of games against 38% expected
6-0, 7-5
L
Bruno Caiado / Anna Zhangmixed
2025-10-04 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Will Blanchard
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Yen Chen / Genevieve Warrenmixed
2025-07-19 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Xu
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-06-21 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeremy Peck
+0.000below expectation — took 14% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
Elynn Wu / Dongping Huangchamps
2025-06-15 · #2 Doubles · with Krystal Garfield
+0.024better than expected — took 54% of games against 44% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-06-07 · #3 Doubles · with Barbara Smith
+0.022about as expected — took 38% of games against 33% expected
6-2, 7-6
W
2025-05-31 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Barbara Smith
+0.068better than expected — took 80% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.