Search

Jeremy Peck

Bothell, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
131 matches · 80W–51L · seasons 20202025
Where Jeremy sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Jeremy is one of 1159 men at 3.5 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 59% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jeremy has played at 4.0, 3.5 across 6 seasons — 1 move up and 2 down.

3.03.54.0202020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Jeremy has gone from the 82nd to the 3rd percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
75.6%
34W–11L · 59.2% of games
4.0
48.4%
15W–16L · 51.9% of games
7.0mixed
86.4%
19W–3L · 65.5% of games
8.0mixed
35.3%
6W–11L · 45.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history131 matches
L
2025-07-26 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kim Weyer
+0.000about as expected — took 40% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-06-21 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Logan Baxter
+0.000below expectation — took 14% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Brad Lee / Hui Yang
2025-04-19 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jaideep Prasad
+0.013about as expected — took 41% of games against 38% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
Sam Wang / Renxuan Wang
2025-04-12 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sukhandeep Singh
+0.012about as expected — took 38% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 7-6
L
Chuck Fiterman / Ali Hashim
2025-03-28 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nipuna Gunasekera
0.029below expectation — took 25% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-03-15 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deron Dahlke
0.029below expectation — took 20% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-03-01 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Martin Ruscha
0.010below expectation — took 38% of games against 44% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
Dean Martin / Raymond Attisha
2025-02-01 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Peters
0.042below expectation — took 37% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Robert McCarthy / Christopher Rink
2025-01-18 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Doni Wanat
+0.026about as expected — took 35% of games against 30% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
2024-10-19 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maria Tamayo
+0.000about as expected — took 37% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2024-09-08 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mei Yang
+0.000better than expected — took 50% of games against 33% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2024-08-17 · #1 Doubles · with Heather Morrow
0.051below expectation — took 42% of games against 62% expected
7-5, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.