Search

Martha Tucker

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
86 matches · 37W–49L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.73
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 6 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
100%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
133 of 144
WA · 3.0
662 of 755

Martha is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Martha has been a steady 3.0 across all 5 seasons on record.

2.53.020192021202320242026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Martha has gone from the 47th to the 9th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.0
26.3%
10W–28L · 42.8% of games
6.0
55.8%
24W–19L · 52.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history86 matches
W
Diane Erickson / Jill Snyder
2026-06-05 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Donna Lou
0.011about as expected — took 55% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
Xiaobei Li / Yunda Huang
2026-02-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathy Trumbauer
0.033below expectation — took 33% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Ana Reyes / Shannon Gerity
2026-01-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathy Trumbauer
0.017below expectation — took 35% of games against 45% expected
7-6, 6-1
L
Naomi Mora / Hwayun Lee
2025-10-18 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joan Murray
0.017below expectation — took 14% of games against 32% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
N/A
2025-10-12 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patricia Allen
+0.032better than expected — took 100% of games against 71% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Kimberly Dirksen / Tammy Miller
2025-10-04 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ann Bowden
+0.030better than expected — took 46% of games against 35% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
Christine Edwardsen / Linda Harroldchamps
2025-09-13 · #3 Doubles · with Alison Aleinikoff
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-3, 6-2
W
Barb Regan / Marcia Chapman
2025-06-06 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carol Geballe
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
7-6, 6-3
L
Sally Linebarger / MaryAnn O'Connell
2025-05-23 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ann Bowden
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-05-15 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Donna Lou
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2024-05-31 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathy Trumbauer
+0.022better than expected — took 44% of games against 39% expected
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2024-05-23 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carol Geballe
+0.019better than expected — took 59% of games against 50% expected
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.