Search

Sandra Stapleton

Redmond, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
65 matches · 28W–37L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.82
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 11 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
99%
stay 3.0
1%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Redmond · 3.0
15 of 17
WA · 3.0
534 of 755

Sandra is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Sandra has been 3.0 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.02019202020212022202320252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2025 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Sandra has gone from the 42nd to the 19th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
43.1%
22W–29L · 47.4% of games
6.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 50.6% of games
7.0
0%
0W–5L · 24.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history65 matches
L
Alison Muir
2026-05-31 · #2 Singles · 3.0
+0.017better than expected — took 50% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
Amy Higgins / Jing Long
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Debra Simmonds
+0.024better than expected — took 38% of games against 32% expected
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W
Rachael Alnwick
2026-05-16 · #2 Singles · 3.0
+0.025better than expected — took 62% of games against 50% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-03-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Debra Simmonds
0.042below expectation — took 29% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
Monica Spain / Lisa Williamson
2026-02-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Debra Simmonds
0.000about as expected — took 56% of games against 56% expected
7-5, 7-6
L
Tammy Chu / Nandita Parikh
2026-02-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Debra Simmonds
+0.007about as expected — took 37% of games against 37% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-02-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Robin Aronson
+0.018about as expected — took 44% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
Annika Andrews / Brooke Krekel
2026-01-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Debra Simmonds
0.019below expectation — took 14% of games against 33% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
Lisa Adamek / Delia Fontaine
2025-11-16 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Robin Aronson
0.019below expectation — took 39% of games against 49% expected
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-10-18 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Robin Aronson
+0.041better than expected — took 60% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-09-07 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Robin Aronson
0.023below expectation — took 35% of games against 47% expected
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
Sharon Singh / Garima Tandon
2025-06-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Holly Hovey
+0.010better than expected — took 58% of games against 53% expected
7-5, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.