← Search

Sandra Stapleton

Redmond, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
65 matches · 28W–37L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sandra Stapleton to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history65 matches
L
2026-05-31 · RTC-Koyama · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-30 · RTC-Koyama · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Debra Simmonds
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-05-16 · RTC-Koyama · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-03-28 · RTC-Koyama · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Debra Simmonds
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-28 · RTC-Simmonds · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Debra Simmonds
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-02-21 · RTC-Simmonds · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Debra Simmonds
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-01 · RTC-Simmonds · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Robin Aronson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-01-24 · RTC-Simmonds · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Debra Simmonds
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-16 · RTC-Tennis Mavens-Simmonds · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Robin Aronson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-10-18 · RTC-Tennis Mavens-Simmonds · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Robin Aronson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-09-07 · RTC-Tennis Mavens-Simmonds · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Robin Aronson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W
2025-06-01 · RTC-Simmonds · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Holly Hovey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
43.1%
22W–29L · 47.4% of games
6.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 50.6% of games
7.0
0%
0W–5L · 24.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
11 matches
#2 Singles
6%
4 matches
#1 Singles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert