← Search

Tena Hanson

Bellevue, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
92 matches · 65W–27L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Tena Hanson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history92 matches
L
2026-08-03 · Fun Over 50 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Courtney Pucci-Babcock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-07-12 · Fun Over 50 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Courtney Pucci-Babcock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-07-02 · Hanson · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-30 · Fun Over 50 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alison Muir
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-16 · Fun Over 50 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Courtney Pucci-Babcock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
N/A
2026-06-13 · Hanson · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-13 · Hanson · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-06 · ETC-Baseline Bandits-Morgan · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-31 · ETC-Baseline Bandits-Morgan · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-05-30 · ETC-Baseline Bandits-Morgan · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-05-24 · ETC-Baseline Bandits-Morgan · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-05-20 · Hanson · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
90.5%
19W–2L · 71.4% of games
3.0
63.3%
31W–18L · 57.2% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
0.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 53.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 53% of the time
#1 Singles
53%
49 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
8 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams