Search

Harben Mahil

Renton, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
102 matches · 52W–50L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.84
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 14 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
98%
stay 3.0
2%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Renton · 3.0
9 of 17
WA · 3.0
670 of 1107

Harben is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Harben has been 3.0 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Harben has gone from the 6th to the 59th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
53.4%
31W–27L · 50.5% of games
3.5
33.3%
8W–16L · 41.3% of games
6.0mixed
83.3%
10W–2L · 65.4% of games
7.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history102 matches
L
Yao Yao / Rucheng Duchamps
2026-06-14 · #3 Doubles · with Derrick Robb
0.015below expectation — took 14% of games against 31% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
Andy Wang / Kurt Nikaitani
2026-05-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mohamad Ghaddar
0.003about as expected — took 37% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Kevin Crowe / Terrance Creighton
2026-04-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mohamad Ghaddar
0.007about as expected — took 56% of games against 59% expected
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Daniel Stark / Matt Prasek
2026-04-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Huy Ngo
0.002about as expected — took 57% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
Dongsheng Yang / Jia Liu
2026-04-12 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Charlie Blondino Jr
+0.011better than expected — took 67% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Miguel Beltran / Ben Smith
2026-04-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Derrick Robb
+0.015about as expected — took 25% of games against 28% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Daniel Du
2026-03-29 · #2 Singles · 3.0
0.023below expectation — took 29% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Madhusudhan Goud Paruchuri
2026-03-22 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.023below expectation — took 20% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Alexander Emmons / Neema Rostami
2026-03-14 · #1 Male Doubles · 3.5 · with Ethan Stakoff
0.004about as expected — took 40% of games against 43% expected
6-4
W
Hyeoncheol Jung / Samuel Manning
2026-03-08 · #1 Male Doubles · 3.5 · with Ibrahim Mushtaq
+0.040better than expected — took 60% of games against 42% expected
6-4
L
2025-12-11 · #2 Doubles · with Laura Araki
+0.010about as expected — took 40% of games against 38% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Christopher Schepper / Andria Bronsonmixed
2025-11-15 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tia Lee
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.