← Search

CALVIN RUTHERFORD

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
52 matches · 28W–24L · seasons 2020–2027

Captains: add CALVIN RUTHERFORD to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history52 matches
L
2026-09-11 · CP-Liu · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Miaomiao Zhang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Luke Burtis championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-13 · #1 Doubles · with Justin Marquart championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-30 · Doubles Trouble · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Luke Burtis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-22 · Doubles Trouble · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joe van Zyl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-07-07 · Doubles Trouble · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Luke Burtis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-31 · CP-Point-Taken-van Zyl · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Luke Burtis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-05-24 · CP-Point-Taken-van Zyl · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joe van Zyl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-05-17 · CP-Shank-Support-Group-van Zyl · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Girish Patwardhan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-09 · CP-Point-Taken-van Zyl · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Luke Burtis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-02 · CP-Point-Taken-van Zyl · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Luke Burtis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-04-25 · CP-Shank-Support-Group-van Zyl · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kamal Elkhadiri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
65.5%
19W–10L · 57.7% of games
4.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 46.3% of games
7.0mixed
41.7%
5W–7L · 51.6% of games
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
12 matches
#1 Singles
6%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams