← Search

Brian Selby

Mercer Island, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
64 matches · 42W–22L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Brian Selby to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
L
2026-06-05 · MI-Selby · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Yetman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-25 · MI-Selby · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dan Kalish
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-05-15 · MI-Selby · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alex Schmidt-Warnecke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
L
2026-05-09 · MI-Selby · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Barber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-02 · MI-Selby · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-04-24 · MI-Selby · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-04-19 · MI-Selby · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charlie Hsu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-28 · MI-Selby · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ken Wolfe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-02-15 · MI-Yetman · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Fauser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
W
2025-10-11 · MI-The Islanders-Bove · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gary Pollastro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2025-09-20 · MI-The Islanders-Bove · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Fauser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2025-09-12 · MI-The Islanders-Bove · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Geoff Lieberman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
84.4%
27W–5L · 62.5% of games
3.5
41.7%
5W–7L · 50% of games
7.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 34.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
23 matches
#1 Singles
20%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
10 matches
#2 Singles
9%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer