Search

Dan Robinet

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
79 matches · 33W–46L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.22
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 9 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.5
187 of 256
WA · 3.5
813 of 1209

Dan is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Dan has been a steady 3.5 across all 7 seasons on record.

3.03.52019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Dan has gone from the 24th to the 38th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level1 levels played
3.5
42.3%
33W–45L · 48.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history79 matches
L
Khyatee Boroowa
2026-05-22 · #1 Singles · 3.5
0.007below expectation — took 20% of games against 32% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Daniel Stark / Gurmit Singh
2026-05-16 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mike Merwin
0.002better than expected — took 75% of games against 68% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Alvin Sato / Bhupinder Cherra
2026-05-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ross Bunker
+0.008about as expected — took 44% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L
Xudong Li / Simon Zhang
2026-04-12 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mike Merwin
0.030below expectation — took 48% of games against 59% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
Bao Trinh / Larry Nguyen
2026-04-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mike Merwin
+0.052better than expected — took 80% of games against 52% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-03-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mike Merwin
+0.003about as expected — took 47% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
Matt Gerrans / Maxton Chisepo
2026-02-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ryan Bussard
+0.014better than expected — took 45% of games against 40% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
David Halgren / Ryan Duffy
2026-01-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with J Michael Diaz
0.053below expectation — took 29% of games against 55% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Douglas Hawkins / Brian Rogers
2026-01-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mike Merwin
0.004about as expected — took 47% of games against 48% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Rob Leidle
2025-05-31 · #1 Singles · 3.5
0.024below expectation — took 14% of games against 34% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
John Sterr
2025-05-16 · #2 Singles · 3.5
+0.022better than expected — took 67% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Carter Woollen / Ryan Leeton
2025-04-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rob Vander Stoep
+0.027better than expected — took 67% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.