← Search

Alyssa Fitzgerald

Medical Lake, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
93 matches · 72W–21L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Alyssa Fitzgerald to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history93 matches
W
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · with Ian Platou championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · with Ian Platou championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · with Ian Platou championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-19 · #1 Doubles · with Caitlin Hicks championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-18 · #2 Doubles · with Caitlin Hicks championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-03-22 · PFC-Geris · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Fasai Xiong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-21 · PFC-Geris · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caitlin Hicks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-03-21 · PFC-Geris · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caitlin Hicks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-03-20 · PFC-Geris · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Fasai Xiong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-02-27 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caitlin Hicks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-02-01 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caitlin Hicks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-01-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caitlin Hicks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
75%
12W–4L · 62.1% of games
4.0
88.2%
30W–4L · 63.5% of games
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 51% of games
8.0mixed
93.3%
14W–1L · 64.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
18 matches
#1 Singles
7%
6 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe