Search

Megan Hill

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
95 matches · 57W–38L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.44
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 12 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
76%
stay 3.5
24%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 94% stay · 6% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.38. Lower than today’s 3.44 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.5
38 of 256
WA · 3.5
182 of 1209

Megan is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Megan has been 3.5 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

3.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Megan has gone from the 73rd to the 76th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
63.3%
50W–29L · 55% of games
4.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
42.9%
6W–8L · 48.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history95 matches
W
2026-06-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kirsten Graham
+0.009better than expected — took 67% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Miwa Nagai / Daye Chung
2026-06-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kirsten Graham
0.004about as expected — took 48% of games against 51% expected
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
Theresa Maloney / Hanley Cahoon
2026-06-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kirsten Graham
+0.094better than expected — took 92% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pam MacDuff
0.008below expectation — took 38% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 7-5
W
Chandra Pandey / Mary Jean Waite
2026-05-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kirsten Graham
+0.020better than expected — took 80% of games against 64% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
Laura Tran / Pera Tran
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kirsten Graham
+0.021better than expected — took 68% of games against 56% expected
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-05-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cindy Jed
+0.036better than expected — took 63% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Mary Smith / Herwinda Tedjaatmadja
2026-04-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pam MacDuff
0.006about as expected — took 44% of games against 47% expected
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pam MacDuff
0.012below expectation — took 43% of games against 49% expected
1-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-03-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kirsten Graham
0.001about as expected — took 39% of games against 41% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Lisa Lemperes / Sarah Besley
2026-02-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kirsten Graham
+0.010about as expected — took 57% of games against 52% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
Julie Bouscaren / Katie Misiewicz
2026-02-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pam MacDuff
+0.004about as expected — took 61% of games against 58% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.