← Search

Cindy Jed

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
55 matches · 24W–31L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Cindy Jed to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history55 matches
W
2026-07-22 · Jed · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-2
L
2026-06-07 · NTC-Team Swoop-Graham · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pam MacDuff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-29 · NTC-Team Swoop-Graham · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pam MacDuff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
N/A
2026-05-16 · NTC-Team Swoop-Graham · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elisabeth LINDLEY
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-09 · NTC-Team Swoop-Graham · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-02 · NTC-Team Swoop-Graham · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kirsten Graham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-03-15 · NTC-Team Swoop-Graham · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kirsten Graham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-6
W
2025-03-13 · Jed · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2025-03-08 · TCSP-McCoy · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Annelliott Willis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2025-03-01 · NTC-Team Swoop-Graham · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-02-26 · Jed · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-2
W
2025-02-22 · NTC-Team Swoop-Graham · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hwashing Heyworth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
47.5%
19W–21L · 49.2% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
38.5%
5W–8L · 42.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
15 matches
#1 Singles
18%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
7 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal