Teams

van Zyl - Doubles or Nothing

2026 One Doubles · 3.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.20 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-03Won 10
W#1 DoublesElnaz Ansari / Ginny Larsen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-07-28vs Big RedLost 01
L#1 DoublesRutchel Lois Abella / Michelle Dauphiny Becker vs Madalena McAllen / Antonette Wood2-6, 1-6
2026-07-21vs Feyerick One DoublesWon 10
W#1 DoublesElnaz Ansari / Ginny Larsen vs Yuni Kwon / Stephanie Gauthier3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-07-06vs Hancock/RitchieLost 01
L#1 DoublesKatie van Zyl / Lyrma Santodomingo vs Jill Hancock / Christie Ritchie2-6, 2-6
2026-06-30vs SUNoritasWon 10
W#1 DoublesKatie van Zyl / Lyrma Santodomingo vs Carley Alexander / Kristine Kleinsmith7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2026-06-26vs Mac AttackLost 01
L#1 DoublesElnaz Ansari / Ginny Larsen vs Trish MacDonald / Joanne Hasbrook4-6, 4-6
2026-06-16vs Pretty GrittyLost 01
L#1 DoublesRutchel Lois Abella / Michelle Dauphiny Becker vs Yuki Omori / Kaori Yamada6-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Ginny Larsen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Lyrma Santodomingo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Rutchel Lois Abella
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Michelle Dauphiny Becker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Elnaz Ansari
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Katie van Zyl
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ginny Larsen + Lyrma Santodomingo11658% games+3.8% vs expected
Michelle Dauphiny Becker + Rutchel Lois Abella2345% games+3.5% vs expected
Lyrma Santodomingo + Katie van Zyl314 matchesnot enough data
Ginny Larsen + Elnaz Ansari213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ginny Larsen
128W–82L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Lyrma Santodomingo
102W–80L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Rutchel Lois Abella
18W–37L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.12
3
Michelle Dauphiny Becker
75W–50L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
2.97
3
Elnaz Ansari
50W–65L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Katie van Zyl
85W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.