Teams

CAC/SL-Bet on our court

2026 Adult 40 & Over · 2.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-13vs MC-2.5W-MorenoWon 30
W#1 DoublesEmilie Purhar / Teresa Martinez vs Mary Jordan / Sheila Loekito6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesTatyana Gordon vs Tammy Morley6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesShiela Apperson / Louise Radtke vs Marci Chew / Joanna Zhao7-5, 6-4
2026-02-28vs ETC-Box 2.5WLost 12
W#1 DoublesMary Turino / Emilie Purhar vs Gwynne Laurente / Sondra Laurent-Michel5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesCeleste Green vs Christina Catzoela1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCarisa Betancourt / Stephanie Heffner vs Caiping Zang / Angeline Newton3-6, 3-6
2026-02-20vs NWW-AYTC-TibbettsLost 03
L#1 DoublesTeresa Martinez / Mary Turino vs Helen Chatalas / Laurie Bauder3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesTatyana Gordon vs Letitia Selk2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCarisa Betancourt / Stephanie Heffner vs Catherine Whissell / Alexandra Tibbetts2-6, 1-6
2026-02-14vs TCSP-DavisLost 12
L#1 DoublesVandella Stewart / Tatyana Gordon vs Melissa Davis / Deborah Rappaport6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesCeleste Green vs Meredith Kelly1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesCarisa Betancourt / Janice Thiel vs Molly Meltsner / Linda Zuckerman6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2026-02-06vs TCSP-SpainLost 12
W#1 DoublesCarisa Betancourt / Mary Turino vs Barbara Trentalange / Diana Einmo6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesShiela Apperson vs Sara Javid2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJanice Thiel / Louise Radtke vs Suzanne Kalberer / Lisa Sowder6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-02-01vs FC-MartinWon 21
W#1 DoublesVandella Stewart / Tatyana Gordon vs Rachel Martin / Jenny Wilson6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesCarisa Betancourt vs Renee Pitra0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesTeresa Martinez / Mary Turino vs Liz Sheffield / Sandra Cullen6-4, 6-2
2026-01-17vs EDG-SolieWon 30
W#1 DoublesCarisa Betancourt / Emilie Purhar vs Sharon Solie / Gesina Howard6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesTatyana Gordon vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMary Turino / Teresa Martinez vs Bonnie Feher / Karen Walter6-1, 6-3
2026-01-02vs NWW-AYTC-TibbettsLost 12
L#1 DoublesVandella Stewart / Emilie Purhar vs Michelle Warren / Helen Chatalas4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesTatyana Gordon vs Letitia Selk1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTeresa Martinez / Mary Turino vs Alexandra Tibbetts / Laurie Bauder6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.14 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.41
Teresa Martinez
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 2.5
2.33
Mary Turino
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.30
Vandella Stewart
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.29
Emilie Purhar
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 2.5
2.23
Tatyana Gordon
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #1 Singles 36% · published 2.5
2.13
Carisa Betancourt
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.10
Janice Thiel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.06
Shiela Apperson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.05
Louise Radtke
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.84
Stephanie Heffner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.78
Celeste Green
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janice Thiel + Louise Radtke3356% games+11.4% vs expected
Louise Radtke + Vandella Stewart2347% games+4.0% vs expected
Stephanie Heffner + Carisa Betancourt1536% games+2.9% vs expected
Stephanie Heffner + Louise Radtke3346% games+1.2% vs expected
Teresa Martinez + Mary Turino9850% games−1.7% vs expected
Vandella Stewart + Tatyana Gordon4543% games−9.4% vs expected
Janice Thiel + Carisa Betancourt4448% games−9.4% vs expected
Emilie Purhar + Vandella Stewart044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Teresa Martinez
21W–31L career · 11 lines in 2026
0%75%25%
2.41
2.5
Mary Turino
33W–31L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.33
Vandella Stewart
24W–39L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.30
2.5
Emilie Purhar
25W–57L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.29
2.5
Tatyana Gordon
35W–68L career · 11 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.23
2.5
Carisa Betancourt
54W–111L career · 9 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Janice Thiel
16W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10
2.5
Shiela Apperson
4W–5L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Louise Radtke
21W–56L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Stephanie Heffner
21W–40L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.84
2.5
Celeste Green
1W–14L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.78

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.