← Search

Yan Hong

REDMOND, WA
3.5C year-end 2024
61 matches · 40W–21L · seasons 2023–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.60
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 30 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
11%
stay 3.5
89%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 54% stay · 46% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.49. Lower than today’s 3.60 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
REDMOND · 3.5
1 of 8
WA · 3.5
21 of 1460

Yan is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Yan has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 4 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.52023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
85.7%
12W–2L · 66.8% of games
3.5
65.2%
15W–8L · 58.9% of games
4.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 52% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 59.1% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history61 matches
L
Amy Cooley / Margot Linde
2026-07-12 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kate Wang
−0.008about as expected — took 41% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
Amy Marlow / Brian Johnsonchamps
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · with Charles Zhang
−0.004about as expected — took 55% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-05 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kate Wang
+0.018better than expected — took 71% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-03 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Danxia Chen
+0.029better than expected — took 63% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-21 · #2 Doubles · with Alexis Chen
−0.007below expectation — took 33% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · with Alexis Chen
+0.016better than expected — took 60% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · with Alexis Chen
+0.002about as expected — took 50% of games against 50% expected
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-23 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alexis Chen
+0.015better than expected — took 60% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alexis Chen
+0.006better than expected — took 71% of games against 63% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-16 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessie Song
−0.039below expectation — took 14% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eileen Lu
+0.027better than expected — took 75% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessie Song
+0.012about as expected — took 44% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.