Teams

Summer Fun Dubs

2026 One Doubles · 3.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-06vs Double ShotzLost 01
L#1 DoublesStella Withey / Tina Zakahi vs Jenn Lee / Caitlin Baker4-6, 4-6
2026-07-27vs Kimchi SquadWon 10
W#1 DoublesShyla Summers / Katie Jergens vs Mabel Tang / Donna Kim6-4, 6-3
2026-07-26vs Insert Tennis Pun HereLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichelle Osborn / Hien Nguyen vs Shelby Hill / Nicole Ung2-6, 5-7
2026-07-13vs Troy's AngelsWon 10
W#1 DoublesShyla Summers / Tina Zakahi vs Lauren Getty / Nikki Ryu Kitagaito7-5, 6-0
2026-06-29vs Midlife CrisisLost 01
L#1 DoublesStella Withey / Katie Jergens vs AliceJane Brush / Molly Scott1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-06-16vs Lobsters Rise AgainLost 01
L#1 DoublesHien Nguyen / Michelle Osborn vs Karen Pan / Arie Park2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Shyla Summers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.44
Katie Jergens
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Stella Withey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Tina Zakahi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Hien Nguyen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Michelle Osborn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tina Zakahi + Katie Jergens15760% games+7.3% vs expected
Hien Nguyen + Stella Withey6260% games+7.0% vs expected
Michelle Osborn + Hien Nguyen10552% games+5.9% vs expected
Tina Zakahi + Stella Withey8357% games+4.5% vs expected
Michelle Osborn + Tina Zakahi10851% games−0.3% vs expected
Hien Nguyen + Tina Zakahi6451% games−3.3% vs expected
Hien Nguyen + Katie Jergens224 matchesnot enough data
Katie Jergens + Stella Withey033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Shyla Summers
40W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Katie Jergens
138W–84L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.44
3.5
Stella Withey
80W–37L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.30
3.5
Tina Zakahi
122W–106L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Hien Nguyen
100W–77L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Michelle Osborn
110W–107L career · 2 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.