CGM-Borchers/Rey

2026 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.94 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

Scouting

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80

MELISSA PISHION BOTTA

usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5

3.77

Yumiko Pike

usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4

3.74

Nenette Olson

usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4

3.61

Susan Ford

usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4

3.48

Becky Rey

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4

3.46

Deborah Borchers

usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4

3.41

Cindy Rushall

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4

3.21

Vicki Blunt

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5

3.11

Lisa Provost

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5

MELISSA PISHION BOTTA

16W–58L career

65%35%0%

3.80

Yumiko Pike

73W–97L career

1%99%0%

3.77

Nenette Olson

122W–164L career

1%99%0%

3.74

Susan Ford

38W–107L career · type S

12%88%0%

3.61

Becky Rey

25W–49L career

40%60%0%

3.48

Deborah Borchers

53W–101L career

47%53%0%

3.46

Cindy Rushall

100W–170L career

60%40%0%

3.41

3.5

Vicki Blunt

89W–109L career

2%98%0%

3.21

3.5

Lisa Provost

37W–120L career

16%84%0%

3.11

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.