← Search

Jason Leong

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
36 matches · 16W–20L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jason Leong to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history36 matches
W
2026-05-24 · MPRC-Cook/Voravongseng · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kana Wakamatsu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-03-21 · MPRC-Cook/Voravongseng · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kana Wakamatsu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-03-02 · WHRC-Dickinson · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Manoj Agnihotri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-01-24 · WHRC-Dickinson · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Robert Crawford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2025-01-18 · WHRC-Dickinson · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sven Louis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2024-06-08 · WHRC-Potter · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Skip Potter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
W
2024-04-21 · WHRC-Potter · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Huang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2024-03-03 · WHRC-Potter · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Todd Khozein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2024-02-18 · WHRC-Potter · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Robert Crawford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2024-01-27 · WHRC-Potter · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Skip Potter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2022-06-11 · SAC-Elmer · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brian Chapler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2022-06-04 · SAC-Elmer · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dave Sato
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2018–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
43.3%
13W–17L · 47.7% of games
6.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 42.6% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
36%
13 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
8 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert