← Teams

SAC-Elmer

2022 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Nathan Watson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.86
Lee Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.86
Steve Elmer
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
—
Bhaskara Bandi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
—
Bret Crawford
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
—
Brian Chapler
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
—
Jason Leong
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.73
Brian Harvey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.51
Dave Sato
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
Results8 ties
2022-06-11Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesBrian Chapler / Jason Leong vs MICHAEL DOHERTY / Joshua Husbands6-3, 6-0
L#1 SinglesSteve Elmer vs Dirk Jacobs7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDave Sato / Nathan Watson vs Michael Sullivan / Eric Sowle6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJohn Doe / Bret Crawford vs Scott Soot / Berk Nelson6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2022-06-05Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesLee Anderson / James King vs Jamil Panni / Scott Quinn7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSteve Elmer / Bret Crawford vs Paul Preston / Carlos Silvas6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDave Sato / Surendranadh Movva vs Mark Darienzo / Dave Sasaki6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-06-04Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesJason Leong / Dave Sato vs Brad Johnson / Ryan Owens6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesSteve Elmer vs ALFREDO ALANIS6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBrian Chapler / Lee Anderson vs Kevin Grant / Wesley Eader3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2022-05-21Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesBrian Chapler / Lee Anderson vs Manoj Agnihotri / Seth Yount6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSteve Elmer / Brian Harvey vs Christian Paulsen / Tom Finnerty6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesNathan Watson / John Doe vs Eric Ayers / Dan Blaker6-2, 6-1
2022-05-14Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesDave Sato / Steve Elmer vs Frank Weiss / MICHAEL DOHERTY6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJohn Doe / Nathan Watson vs Brendan Finn / Ryan Baenen1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-05-08Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesBhaskara Bandi / Lee Anderson vs Keith Westrum / Johan Hong7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesNathan Watson / Surendranadh Movva vs Jason Hughes / Kjell Ostlund6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBret Crawford / Steve Elmer vs Norman Langston / Tom Hsu6-0, 6-3
2022-04-24Split 2–2
L#1 DoublesJames King / Bhaskara Bandi vs David Bean / Alan Staggers6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesSteve Elmer vs John LaBarca6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJason Leong / Dave Sato vs William Seidl / Scott Naugler1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBret Crawford / Brian Chapler vs Paul Ecker / Robert Grenzer6-4, 6-4
2022-04-09Split 2–2
L#1 DoublesJason Leong / James King vs Manoj Pandya / Johan Hong6-2, 7-5
W#1 SinglesSteve Elmer vs Terrence Trausch6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBret Crawford / Nathan Watson vs Ed de la Fuente / Masafumi Inoue6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBrian Chapler / Surendranadh Movva vs Tom Hsu / Fred Sutardjo6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Nathan Watson
32W–41L career
0%95%5%
2.90
3
Lee Anderson
45W–53L career
0%94%6%
2.86
3
Steve Elmer
61W–77L career
0%94%5%
2.86
3
Bhaskara Bandi
23W–16L career
not enough data
—
3
Bret Crawford
13W–44L career
not enough data
—
3
Brian Chapler
10W–12L career
not enough data
—
3
Jason Leong
16W–20L career
not enough data
—
3
Brian Harvey
15W–20L career
4%95%1%
2.73
3
Dave Sato
40W–110L career
31%69%0%
2.51

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.