← Search

Nate Ford

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
31 matches · 18W–13L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Nate Ford to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history31 matches
L
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Max Breslau championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-14 · IRV-Ford · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Justin Ford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-31 · IRV-Johnson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Max Breslau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
Lake Ihly / Joel Garcia
2026-05-22 · IRV-Ford · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Pat Soong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-1
L
2026-05-17 · IRV-Ford · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Joseph Palodichuk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-05-03 · IRV-Johnson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-04-25 · IRV-Johnson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Max Breslau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-04-19 · IRV-Johnson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cameron Mitchell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-04-03 · IRV-Johnson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-03-29 · IRV-Johnson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Max Breslau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2025-06-14 · IRV-Boyer · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Johnston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2025-06-01 · IRV-Ford · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Justin Ford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
73.7%
14W–5L · 59.2% of games
4.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 31.2% of games
8.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 56.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 61% of the time
#1 Doubles
61%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams