Teams

NOR-McGirk

2026 One Doubles · 4.5 Men

6 players · average NTRP 4.42 / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-08-16vs NOR-BurnsLost 01
L#1 DoublesJack Yothers / James Luu vs Jordan Burns / Simon Waite1-6, 4-6
2026-08-15vs Back to 4.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesThomas McGirk / Jack Yothers vs Matt Simmering / Bradley Sumoge6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2026-08-09vs B2WWon 10
W#1 DoublesPaul Ezelle / Mike Zielinski vs Louis Wheatley / Owen Chu6-3, 6-3
2026-08-01vs Serve and ForehandWon 10
W#1 DoublesThomas McGirk / Paul Ezelle vs Renato Bernasconi Zuccari / Mike McNairy6-2, 6-2
2026-07-26vs NOR-ShultzWon 10
W#1 DoublesMike Zielinski / Paul Ezelle vs Eddie Schultz / Alex Hart6-1, 6-3
2026-07-14vs FanelliLost 01
L#1 DoublesPaul Ezelle / Thomas McGirk vs Matt Fanelli / Kyle Kinderknecht4-6, 4-6
2026-07-11vs Ward-Lawn Chair LegendsLost 01
L#1 DoublesPaul Ezelle / Sherwood Newell vs Bo Johnson / Bryan Ward6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-07-11vs ShullWon 10
W#1 DoublesMike Zielinski / Thomas McGirk vs Danh Nguyen / Mingyang Liu6-4, 6-3
2026-07-09vs Courtside ManorWon 10
W#1 DoublesSherwood Newell / Mike Zielinski vs Nathan Austin / Ramsey Selbak6-1, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.12 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.34
Paul Ezelle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.29
James Luu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Sherwood Newell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.10
Thomas McGirk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.98
Mike Zielinski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.90
Jack Yothers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paul Ezelle + Jack Yothers044 matchesnot enough data
Mike Zielinski + Thomas McGirk224 matchesnot enough data
Thomas McGirk + Jack Yothers033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Paul Ezelle
82W–43L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
4.34
4.5
James Luu
55W–58L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
4.29
4.5
Sherwood Newell
20W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
4.5
Thomas McGirk
91W–104L career · 4 lines in 2026
24%75%<1%
4.10
4
Mike Zielinski
58W–38L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.98
4.5
Jack Yothers
43W–57L career · 2 lines in 2026
77%23%<1%
3.90

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.