← Search

David Wiley

Portland, OR
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
64 matches · 35W–29L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add David Wiley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
L
2026-02-15 · MAC-Austin · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mark Simpson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-01-24 · MAC-Austin · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Daniel Tseng
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-11-27 · N OR-MAC-Siegel · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Rodrigo Aguilar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-10-03 · N OR-MAC-Siegel · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Mike Easton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-09-28 · N OR-MAC-Siegel · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Todd Siegel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-09-13 · N OR-MAC-Siegel · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Christopher Haddon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2025-06-22 · #3 Doubles · with Bryan Ward championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-06-21 · #2 Doubles · with Mike Easton championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-06-21 · #2 Doubles · with Mike Easton championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
L
2025-06-20 · #3 Doubles · with Mike Easton championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-06-06 · MAC-Nilsson · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Dirk Koopman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-04-13 · MAC-Nilsson · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Greg Masson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.5
66.7%
22W–11L · 54.9% of games
9.0
42.9%
6W–8L · 46.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 45% of the time
#3 Doubles
45%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
13 matches
#2 Singles
6%
4 matches
#1 Singles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams