Search

Christopher Haddon

Portland, OR
4.5C year-end 2025
116 matches · 39W–77L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

4.02
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 10 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
39%
down to 4.0
61%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0
Projected to December: 23% down · 77% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 4.06. Higher than today’s 4.02 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 4.5
77 of 119
OR · 4.5
150 of 226

Christopher is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams56 teams · 2007–2026
N OR-MAC-Siegel
2026 Adult 55 & Over · 9.0 Men
2026
MAC-Austin
2026 Adult 40 & Over · 4.5 Men
2026
N OR-MAC-Nilsson
2025 Adult 40 & Over · 4.5 Men
2025
N OR-MAC-Siegel
2025 Adult 55 & Over · 9.0 Men
2025
MAC-Aguilar/Austin
2024 Adult 18 & Over · 4.5 Men
2024
MAC-Aguilar/Austin
2024 Adult 40 & Over · 4.5 Men
2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Christopher has been a steady 4.5 across all 8 seasons on record.

4.04.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Christopher has gone from the 39th to the 16th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.5
29%
18W–44L · 43.7% of games
9.0
38.5%
5W–8L · 48.2% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 47.3% of games
9.0mixed
53.3%
8W–7L · 52.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history116 matches
W
Duke Dixon / Curt Andersenchamps
2026-06-27 · MAC-Austin · #3 Doubles · with Todd Siegel
+0.103better than expected — took 100% of games against 46% expected
1-0
L
Cameron Ragen / Carl Swansonchamps
2026-06-27 · MAC-Austin · #3 Doubles · with Todd Siegel
0.025below expectation — took 14% of games against 35% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
Toby Krauel / Daniel Burnschamps
2026-06-26 · MAC-Austin · #1 Doubles · with David Reynoldson
0.026below expectation — took 28% of games against 43% expected
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-02-28 · MAC-Austin · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ken Schwerd
0.011better than expected — took 80% of games against 73% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-02-22 · MAC-Austin · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Reynoldson
0.022below expectation — took 32% of games against 44% expected
7-6, 6-0
L
2026-01-04 · MAC-Austin · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Reynoldson
0.037below expectation — took 33% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-11-23 · N OR-MAC-Siegel · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with David Reynoldson
+0.033better than expected — took 62% of games against 46% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
2025-11-16 · N OR-MAC-Siegel · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Mike Easton
+0.002below expectation — took 25% of games against 32% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Thomas McGirk / Daniel Burns
2025-09-28 · N OR-MAC-Siegel · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Mike Easton
+0.017better than expected — took 48% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-09-13 · N OR-MAC-Siegel · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with David Wiley
0.016about as expected — took 59% of games against 63% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
Don Ballew / Mark Villegaschamps
2025-06-22 · N OR-MAC-Nilsson · #1 Doubles · with Mike Easton
0.005about as expected — took 40% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-06-21 · N OR-MAC-Nilsson · #3 Doubles · with Todd Siegel
+0.090better than expected — took 75% of games against 35% expected
6-2, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.