Search

Ngon Phan

Renton, WA
4.0A year-end 2025
90 matches · 74W–16L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.85
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 14 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
97%
stay 4.0
3%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 99% stay · 1% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.81. Lower than today’s 3.85 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Renton · 4.0
1 of 14
WA · 4.0
94 of 782

Ngon is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Ngon has played at 4.0, 4.5 across 4 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

3.54.04.52022202320242026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Ngon has gone from the 95th to the 80th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
4.0
83.3%
20W–4L · 61.8% of games
4.5
75%
6W–2L · 57.7% of games
8.0
73.3%
11W–4L · 59.4% of games
9.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
85.7%
12W–2L · 67.1% of games
9.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history90 matches
W
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Heather Waters
+0.000better than expected — took 58% of games against 46% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-11 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with My Nguyen
+0.000better than expected — took 72% of games against 50% expected
6-0, 7-5
W
Benjamin Kelch / Robert Eiland
2026-05-23 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Fan
+0.007better than expected — took 67% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Kevin Li / Eliot Tong
2026-04-26 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Porter
+0.003about as expected — took 57% of games against 53% expected
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Fan
0.018below expectation — took 56% of games against 62% expected
7-6, 7-5
W
Erwin Chung / Pablo Bernal
2026-04-04 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with NIKHIL PARSI
+0.001about as expected — took 60% of games against 58% expected
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-03-01 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Porter
+0.041better than expected — took 62% of games against 43% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-02-06 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Porter
+0.005about as expected — took 56% of games against 54% expected
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Chris Bridgeman / Dustin Schmidt
2026-02-01 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Porter
+0.035better than expected — took 86% of games against 62% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-01-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with NIKHIL PARSI
0.003about as expected — took 35% of games against 40% expected
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-01-03 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Porter
+0.014better than expected — took 52% of games against 44% expected
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
Loi Caldwell / Kemp Chanthanalay
2025-10-25 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Hung Nguyen
0.010below expectation — took 41% of games against 46% expected
7-6, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.