Teams

EW-Peak-Cattell

2026 Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.58 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-16vs CBRC-BoomeRangsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSigne White / Richard Dean Hendrickson vs Vincent Beasley / Carol Curry7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAngie Stilson / Doug Conboy vs Walter Josephson / Xia Suter4-6, 3-6
2026-08-16vs PC-Vintage SmashersWon 20
W#1 DoublesAngie Stilson / Doug Conboy vs Wayne Kohan / Midori Nyby7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSigne White / Richard Dean Hendrickson vs Clinton Marvel / Joyce Donais6-1, 6-0
2026-08-15vs PC-Vintage SmashersWon 20
W#1 DoublesJohn Cattell / Christine Cattell vs Wayne Kohan / Patti Marvel6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSigne White / Richard Dean Hendrickson vs Clinton Marvel / Midori Nyby6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2026-08-15vs YTC-ChoyWon 20
W#1 DoublesAngie Stilson / Doug Conboy vs Corinne Choy / Guislain Lagron6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChristine Cattell / John Cattell vs Estelle Patten / Mark Cherry6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2026-08-14vs CBRC-BoomeRangsLost 12
W#1 DoublesJohn Cattell / Christine Cattell vs Kristi Thomsen / Walter Josephson6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSigne White / Richard Dean Hendrickson vs Xia Suter / Emmitt Jackson6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAngie Stilson / Doug Conboy vs Carol Curry / Vincent Beasley2-6, 3-6
2026-08-14vs YTC-ChoyWon 20
W#1 DoublesChristine Cattell / John Cattell vs Estelle Patten / Danny Mullins0-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSigne White / Richard Dean Hendrickson vs Jody Snyder / Mark Cherry6-0, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Doug Conboy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
Gerald Spina
published 4
3.65
John Cattell
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.28
Signe White
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.28
Richard Dean Hendrickson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Christine Cattell
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.62
Tammy LaValley
published
2.50
Angie Stilson
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christine Cattell + John Cattell35859% games+11.4% vs expected
Signe White + Richard Dean Hendrickson213 matchesnot enough data
Doug Conboy + Angie Stilson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Doug Conboy
92W–56L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Gerald Spina
10W–14L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
John Cattell
157W–68L career · 4 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
3.65
3.5
Signe White
26W–54L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.28
Richard Dean Hendrickson
13W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%5%
3.28
3
Christine Cattell
68W–95L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
Tammy LaValley
20W–31L career · no lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
2.62
3
Angie Stilson
3W–13L career · no lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
2.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.