THPRD-Feng 8.0

2026 Mixed 55 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 3.95 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

Scouting

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79

Kris Kelly-Koster

usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4

3.75

Karen Dellinger

usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4

—

Derek Carlson

published 4

3.70

Van Khieu

usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 4

3.67

Linda Lovett

usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4

3.64

Steve Sun

usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4

3.53

Frank Shen

usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4

3.47

Bill Henderson

usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 4

3.39

Rie Sasakawa

usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4

3.27

Christine Wall

usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 4

3.25

Jing Feng

usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

Kris Kelly-Koster

79W–101L career

0%99%0%

3.79

Karen Dellinger

141W–68L career

1%99%0%

3.75

Derek Carlson

51W–24L career

not enough data

—

Van Khieu

99W–48L career

1%99%0%

3.70

Linda Lovett

93W–105L career

4%96%0%

3.67

Steve Sun

51W–78L career

6%94%0%

3.64

Frank Shen

38W–69L career

25%75%0%

3.53

Bill Henderson

108W–120L career

42%58%0%

3.47

Rie Sasakawa

129W–121L career

66%34%0%

3.39

Christine Wall

81W–92L career

93%7%0%

3.27

3.5

Jing Feng

113W–80L career

1%99%0%

3.25

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.