PTC-Melander/Novak

2026 Mixed 40 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 3.91 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

Scouting

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05

Rachel Ritchie

published 4

—

Chu Lee

usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4

3.74

Rachel Novak

usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4

3.67

HOLLY LIBERATORE

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4

3.65

Christina Melander

usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4

3.56

Gabriela McIntosh

usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4

3.56

Dan de Leon

usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4

3.52

Austin Rice-Stitt

usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4

3.44

John Jay

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4

3.42

Dana Nolan

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5

3.22

Scott Tse

usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

Rachel Ritchie

75W–19L career

0%67%33%

4.05

Chu Lee

1W–1L career · type S

not enough data

—

Rachel Novak

71W–39L career

1%99%0%

3.74

HOLLY LIBERATORE

123W–75L career

4%96%0%

3.67

Christina Melander

110W–81L career

4%96%0%

3.65

Gabriela McIntosh

110W–90L career

18%82%0%

3.56

Dan de Leon

30W–28L career

23%77%0%

3.56

Austin Rice-Stitt

77W–49L career

26%74%0%

3.52

John Jay

39W–24L career

50%50%0%

3.44

3.5

Dana Nolan

72W–25L career

0%94%6%

3.42

3.5

Scott Tse

40W–39L career · type A

2%98%0%

3.22

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.