← Search

William Creger

BEAVERTON, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
116 matches · 73W–43L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add William Creger to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history116 matches
W
2026-06-06 · CAC-Deems · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mike Zielinski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-05-31 · CAC-Deems · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Grant Grainger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-03 · CAC-Deems · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mike Zielinski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
Jose Yanez / Samuel Valeri
2026-03-09 · #2 Doubles · with Mike Zielinski championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
Benjamin Davidson / Joe Zucht
2026-03-09 · #2 Doubles · with Mike Zielinski championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
Jeffrey Lee / Jackie Sanvises
2026-03-08 · #2 Doubles · with Mike Zielinski championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
Brandon Kondis / Nick Yang
2026-03-08 · #2 Doubles · with Mike Zielinski championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-07 · #2 Doubles · with Mike Zielinski championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2025-12-06 · LOTC-Ferrer · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Emily McBride mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
W
2025-12-05 · LOTC-Ferrer · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ellen Mader mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-11-22 · THPRD-Pham 9.0 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ellen Pearson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-11-15 · THPRD-Pham 9.0 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Mary Green-Zwemke mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
65.1%
28W–15L · 53% of games
7.0mixed
83.3%
10W–2L · 61.1% of games
8.0mixed
64%
16W–9L · 54.8% of games
9.0mixed
50%
9W–9L · 52.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
37 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
17 matches
#1 Singles
12%
14 matches
#2 Singles
7%
8 matches
#1 Male Singles
6%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer