Search

William Creger

BEAVERTON, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
112 matches · 71W–41L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.83
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 9 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
98%
stay 4.0
2%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
BEAVERTON · 4.0
2 of 6
OR · 4.0
90 of 498

William is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams22 teams · 2022–2026
CAC-Deems
2026 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Men
2026
LOTC-Ferrer
2026 Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 Mixed
2026
THPRD-Pham 9.0
2026 Mixed 18 & Over · 9.0 Mixed
2026
CRRC-Ferrer/Ounaphom
2025 Mixed 18 & Over · 9.0 Mixed
2025
CAC-Deems
2025 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Men
2025
N OR-Deems
2025 One Doubles · 4.0 Men
2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

William has been a steady 4.0 across all 5 seasons on record.

3.54.020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, William has gone from the 38th to the 41st percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
4.0
65.1%
28W–15L · 53% of games
7.0
80%
4W–1L · 61.7% of games
9.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 60.2% of games
8.0mixed
64%
16W–9L · 54.8% of games
9.0mixed
64.3%
9W–5L · 55.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history112 matches
W
2026-06-06 · CAC-Deems · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mike Zielinski
+0.028better than expected — took 65% of games against 51% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-05-31 · CAC-Deems · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Grant Grainger
0.018about as expected — took 60% of games against 64% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-03 · CAC-Deems · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mike Zielinski
+0.039better than expected — took 65% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
Jose Yanez / Samuel Valerichamps
2026-03-09 · CAC-Deems · #2 Doubles · with Mike Zielinski
0.047below expectation — took 25% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Benjamin Davidson / Joe Zuchtchamps
2026-03-09 · CAC-Deems · #2 Doubles · with Mike Zielinski
0.024below expectation — took 38% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 7-5
W
Jeffrey Lee / Jackie Sanviseschamps
2026-03-08 · CAC-Deems · #2 Doubles · with Mike Zielinski
+0.028better than expected — took 71% of games against 55% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Brandon Kondis / Nick Yangchamps
2026-03-08 · CAC-Deems · #2 Doubles · with Mike Zielinski
+0.010better than expected — took 50% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
Kyle Lundon / William Manhkongchamps
2026-03-07 · CAC-Deems · #2 Doubles · with Mike Zielinski
0.013below expectation — took 46% of games against 52% expected
7-6, 7-6
W
2025-12-06 · LOTC-Ferrer · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Emily McBride
+0.000better than expected — took 59% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
2025-12-05 · LOTC-Ferrer · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ellen Mader
+0.000better than expected — took 92% of games against 78% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
Emily Hagelgans / Scott Powersmixed
2025-11-22 · THPRD-Pham 9.0 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ellen Pearson
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-11-15 · THPRD-Pham 9.0 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Mary Green-Zwemke
+0.000below expectation — took 37% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.