Teams

STSC-Volley Llamas

2026 ADULT 40 & Over · 4.0 Women (A40)

12 players · average NTRP 3.95 / SOUTHERN OREGON

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-05-03vs SOR-ACB-MasseyLost 13
W#1 DoublesDebra VanHouten / Tiffany Bulgin vs Margaret Collier / Christina Godat6-2, 7-6
L#1 SinglesRhonda Thomas vs Morgan Sugar-BUtter4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesConnie Peters / Karen Smith vs Jennifer Vana / Amy Antoniak7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDana Richardson / Jennifer Schmelling vs Irene Moore / Karen Berky2-6, 4-6
2026-05-03vs ATFC-KnoxSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJennifer Schmelling / Rhonda Thomas vs Mary Steinbergs / Kelly Sacks6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMelanie Wong vs Christie Chiang6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesConnie Peters / Karen Smith vs Joanne Beckett / Dana Yearsley2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesTiffany Bulgin / Dana Richardson vs Julie Schmiess / Alexandra Hamilton3-6, 6-7
2026-05-02vs ACB-SweeneyLost 13
L#1 DoublesCatherine Wheeler / Debra VanHouten vs Jennifer Sweeney / Chris Gregory2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJennifer Schmelling vs Britani Kavanaugh3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTiffany Bulgin / Kerry Moyer vs Gina Streck / Sarah Leslie4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDana Richardson / Janet Lui-Hansen vs Stephanie Swaggerty / Charlene Small5-7, 0-6
2026-05-02vs Bend/PDX-Net NinjasLost 12
L#1 DoublesCatherine Wheeler / Debra VanHouten vs Donna Kennish / Angelina Warriner4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTiffany Bulgin / Janet Lui-Hansen vs Rochelle Hart / Carrie Fisher4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesAbby Swancutt / Kerry Moyer vs Flor Harrigan / Julie Hansen6-2, 6-3
2026-05-01vs ESTC-MohlerLost 13
W#1 DoublesDebra VanHouten / Rhonda Thomas vs Bobbi Kearney / Aubree Nash6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMelanie Wong vs Gayle Larsen4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCatherine Wheeler / Karen Smith vs Tami Calkin / Brenda Nulty5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Schmelling / Dana Richardson vs Julie Mohler / Denise Wolfe2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women (A40) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Jennifer Schmelling
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.91
Rhonda Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.81
Melanie Wong
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Connie Peters
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Debra VanHouten
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Abby Swancutt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Catherine Wheeler
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.65
Karen Smith
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Janet Lui-Hansen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.57
Tiffany Bulgin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.26
Dana Richardson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Kerry Moyer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janet Lui-Hansen + Karen Smith8170% games+17.0% vs expected
Catherine Wheeler + Debra VanHouten13657% games+7.0% vs expected
Kerry Moyer + Abby Swancutt161350% games−1.6% vs expected
Debra VanHouten + Rhonda Thomas3251% games−2.7% vs expected
Jennifer Schmelling + Rhonda Thomas2439% games−4.3% vs expected
Jennifer Schmelling + Dana Richardson044 matchesnot enough data
Debra VanHouten + Dana Richardson224 matchesnot enough data
Dana Richardson + Connie Peters134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jennifer Schmelling
75W–83L career · 15 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.93
4
Rhonda Thomas
60W–46L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.91
Melanie Wong
5W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.81
4
Connie Peters
53W–35L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Debra VanHouten
42W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Abby Swancutt
22W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Catherine Wheeler
67W–46L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.67
4
Karen Smith
44W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
3.65
4
Janet Lui-Hansen
42W–57L career · 2 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.59
4
Tiffany Bulgin
52W–38L career · 4 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.57
3.5
Dana Richardson
20W–53L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
Kerry Moyer
19W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.