Teams

ATFC-Knox

2026 ADULT 40 & Over · 4.0 Women (A40)

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTHERN OREGON

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-05-03vs ESTC-MohlerSplit 22
L#1 DoublesNora Knox / ELIZABETH SCHOENLBER vs Tami Calkin / Gayle Larsen1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesDana Yearsley vs Janae Smith7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJulie Schmiess / Alexandra Hamilton vs Bobbi Kearney / Aubree Nash3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCarol Yirak / Deborah Herron vs Jody Rolnick / Sarah Wiggins6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-05-03vs STSC-Volley LlamasSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMary Steinbergs / Kelly Sacks vs Jennifer Schmelling / Rhonda Thomas2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesChristie Chiang vs Melanie Wong3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJoanne Beckett / Dana Yearsley vs Connie Peters / Karen Smith6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJulie Schmiess / Alexandra Hamilton vs Tiffany Bulgin / Dana Richardson6-3, 7-6
2026-05-02vs ACB-SweeneyWon 31
W#1 DoublesMary Steinbergs / Kelly Sacks vs Jennifer Sweeney / Charlene Small6-4, 7-6
W#1 SinglesChristie Chiang vs Sarah Leslie6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesELIZABETH SCHOENLBER / Deborah Herron vs Gina Streck / Stephanie Swaggerty6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCarol Yirak / Kate McInerny vs Chris Gregory / Stephanie Nunnenkamp0-6, 5-7
2026-05-01vs Bend/PDX-Net NinjasWon 31
W#1 DoublesELIZABETH SCHOENLBER / Joanne Beckett vs Rochelle Hart / Carrie Fisher6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDana Yearsley vs Angelina Warriner2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCarol Yirak / Deborah Herron vs Flor Harrigan / Kelly Mohr4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesNora Knox / Kate McInerny vs Donna Kennish / Julie Hansen6-3, 6-3
2026-05-01vs SOR-ACB-MasseyWon 31
W#1 DoublesNora Knox / Dana Yearsley vs Irene Moore / Jennifer Vana6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesChristie Chiang vs Morgan Sugar-BUtter1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMary Steinbergs / Kelly Sacks vs Amy Antoniak / Sarah Brookfield6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJulie Schmiess / Alexandra Hamilton vs Christina Godat / Margaret Collier6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women (A40) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Dana Yearsley
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.88
Mary Steinbergs
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.84
Nora Knox
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.79
Alexandra Hamilton
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
ELIZABETH SCHOENLBER
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
Kelly Sacks
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.71
Julie Schmiess
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.64
Joanne Beckett
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.57
Christie Chiang
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.56
Carol Yirak
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.50
Deborah Herron
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.47
Kate McInerny
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dana Yearsley + Joanne Beckett12361% games+5.9% vs expected
ELIZABETH SCHOENLBER + Joanne Beckett6255% games+1.6% vs expected
Kelly Sacks + Mary Steinbergs3254% games+0.3% vs expected
Kelly Sacks + Joanne Beckett6457% games−1.6% vs expected
ELIZABETH SCHOENLBER + Nora Knox13857% games−2.9% vs expected
Carol Yirak + Kate McInerny41044% games−7.5% vs expected
Nora Knox + Joanne Beckett6552% games−13.9% vs expected
Carol Yirak + Nora Knox404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dana Yearsley
40W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.93
Mary Steinbergs
17W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.88
Nora Knox
56W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Alexandra Hamilton
5W–5L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.79
4
ELIZABETH SCHOENLBER
29W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
Kelly Sacks
12W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
Julie Schmiess
14W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.71
Joanne Beckett
47W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%85%<1%
3.64
4
Christie Chiang
41W–32L career · 3 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.57
4
Carol Yirak
42W–39L career · 3 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.56
4
Deborah Herron
61W–55L career · 3 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.50
Kate McInerny
19W–38L career · 2 lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
3.47

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.