← Search

Deena Cook

Bend, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
58 matches · 36W–22L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Deena Cook to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history58 matches
L
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Megan Miller championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Noreen Kaye championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-01 · ACB-Table for Three · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Hamilton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-31 · ACB-Table for Three · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-17 · ACB-Swaggerty · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Cole
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-16 · ACB-Swaggerty · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Cole
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-05 · ACB-Swaggerty · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Snyder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-11-22 · ACB-Young · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Donna Kennish
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-11-15 · ACB-Young · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Donna Kennish
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-10-26 · ACB-Young · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Donna Kennish
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2025-10-25 · ACB-Young · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Donna Kennish
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-10-11 · BGC-Fraley/Carr · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cathleen Carr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
65.7%
23W–12L · 56.7% of games
3.5
25%
2W–6L · 44.4% of games
6.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
100%
5W–0L · 65.3% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 36% of the time
#1 Singles
36%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
9 matches
#2 Singles
14%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert