← Search

Sarah Leslie

BEND, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
63 matches · 44W–19L · seasons 2023–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.52
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 15 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
39%
stay 3.5
61%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 79% stay · 21% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.43. Lower than today’s 3.52 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
BEND · 3.5
1 of 6
OR · 3.5
52 of 735

Sarah is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Sarah has been 3.5 for all 4 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.03.52023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Sarah has gone from the 57th to the 57th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
0.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
91.7%
11W–1L · 70.6% of games
3.5
70%
14W–6L · 57.2% of games
4.0
50%
5W–5L · 50% of games
6.0mixed
76.9%
10W–3L · 62.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history63 matches
W
Denise Poisson / Anita Phillips
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Britani Kavanaugh
+0.088better than expected — took 80% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Gina Hedberg
2026-05-16 · #2 Singles · 3.5
−0.071below expectation — took 25% of games against 59% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-05-03 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Sweeney
+0.004about as expected — took 47% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
Rochelle Hart / Julie Hansen
2026-05-03 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Britani Kavanaugh
+0.040better than expected — took 67% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Tiffany Bulgin / Kerry Moyer
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gina Streck
+0.012about as expected — took 50% of games against 46% expected
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Christie Chiang
2026-05-02 · #1 Singles · 4.0
+0.019better than expected — took 43% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
Sherry Rogers / Jennifer Vana
2026-05-01 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Gregory
−0.026below expectation — took 29% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Melanie Wong
2026-04-26 · #2 Singles · 4.0
−0.038below expectation — took 14% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Megan Jensen
2026-04-19 · #2 Singles · 3.5
+0.004better than expected — took 86% of games against 72% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Sarah Follett / Angela Hamilton
2026-04-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan Miller
−0.048below expectation — took 71% of games against 81% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
Ranee McDougal / Dana Richardson
2026-04-12 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Britani Kavanaugh
+0.108better than expected — took 80% of games against 33% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-11 · #2 Singles · 3.5
−0.013about as expected — took 59% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.