← Search

Megan Jensen

Salem, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
30 matches · 16W–14L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Megan Jensen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history30 matches
W
2026-08-01 · STSC-Wait! No pickleball? · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca Ostergaard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-01 · STSC-Wait! No pickleball? · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Meghan Fletcher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-07-26 · STSC-I'd Smash That! · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Matthew Schrumpf mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-25 · STSC-I'd Smash That! · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Freeman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-07-25 · STSC-Santiam United · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Erik Jensen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-07-24 · STSC-Santiam United · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Erik Jensen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-17 · STSC-Ostergaard · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca Ostergaard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-16 · STSC-Trisha Rutherford · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-05-10 · STSC-Ostergaard · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca Ostergaard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-26 · STSC-Ostergaard · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca Ostergaard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-19 · STSC-Trisha Rutherford · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-12 · STSC-Ostergaard · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ann McQueen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
52.9%
9W–8L · 49.4% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 64.8% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
37%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
10%
3 matches
#2 Singles
10%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer