Search

Megan Jensen

Salem, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
24 matches · 14W–10L · seasons 20252026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.06
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 14 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
24%
stay 3.0
76%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 69% stay · 31% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.96. Lower than today’s 3.06 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Salem · 3.0
4 of 13
OR · 3.0
91 of 746

Megan is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Megan has been a steady 3.0 across all 2 seasons on record.

2.53.020252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Megan has gone from the 63rd to the 51st percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 53.8% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 64.8% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history24 matches
W
Kelli Carter / Natalie Miller
2026-08-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca Ostergaard
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-26 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Matthew Schrumpf
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Freeman
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Erik Jensen
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-24 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Erik Jensen
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
Jessica Watson / Lauren Kelling
2026-05-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca Ostergaard
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-16 · #2 Singles · 3.5
+0.008about as expected — took 42% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
Diana Sandgren / Carol Roeder
2026-05-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca Ostergaard
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 7-5
W
Susan Berado / Lynne Oldham
2026-04-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca Ostergaard
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-19 · #2 Singles · 3.5
+0.015below expectation — took 14% of games against 21% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Laurie Spellman / Elizabeth Harn
2026-04-12 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ann McQueen
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca Ostergaard
0.006below expectation — took 29% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.