← Search

Matthew Schrumpf

Salem, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
32 matches · 19W–13L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Matthew Schrumpf to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history32 matches
W
2026-08-02 · SOR-STSC-Schrumpf · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Scott Fox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-01 · SOR-STSC-Schrumpf · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Scott Fox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-01 · SOR-STSC-Schrumpf · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Scott Fox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-31 · SOR-STSC-Schrumpf · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Scott Fox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-26 · STSC-I'd Smash That! · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Megan Jensen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-25 · STSC-I'd Smash That! · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rebecca Ostergaard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-24 · STSC-I'd Smash That! · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rebecca Ostergaard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-24 · STSC-Santiam United · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rebecca Ostergaard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
N/A
2026-05-31 · STSC-Coleman · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Beyrouty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-30 · STSC-Coleman · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ephraim Zuckerman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-19 · SOR-STSC-Schrumf · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-19 · SOR-STSC-Schrumf · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2025–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
91.7%
11W–1L · 63.8% of games
3.5
0%
0W–4L · 29.4% of games
6.0mixed
70%
7W–3L · 56.1% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
8 matches
#1 Singles
22%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert