Search

Don Hakala

Eugene, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
89 matches · 52W–37L · seasons 20202026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.06
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 15 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
21%
stay 3.0
79%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 66% stay · 34% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.97. Lower than today’s 3.06 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Eugene · 3.0
2 of 5
OR · 3.0
91 of 600

Don is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams22 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Don has been a steady 3.0 across all 5 seasons on record.

2.53.020212023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Don has gone from the 80th to the 81st percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
67.9%
19W–9L · 54.6% of games
3.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 43.1% of games
6.0mixed
64%
16W–9L · 51.6% of games
7.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 44% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history89 matches
W
Vaughn Hegy / Laurie Haubermixed
2026-07-26 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Laurie Spellman
+0.000better than expected — took 65% of games against 50% expected
7-6, 6-1
L
Megan Jensen / Matthew Schrumpfmixed
2026-07-26 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Laurie Spellman
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Janelle Leavell / Scott Leavellmixed
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Laurie Spellman
+0.000below expectation — took 44% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
Stephanie Swaggerty / Rich Akersmixed
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bobbi Kearney
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Megan Jensen / Erik Jensenmixed
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Aubree Nash
+0.000below expectation — took 42% of games against 68% expected
7-5, 0-6, 1-0
L
Alejandra Reyes / Kelley Strawnmixed
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Angela Copeland
+0.000below expectation — took 14% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
Elmer Rasmussen / Dawn Vlahandreasmixed
2026-05-29 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Angela Copeland
+0.000better than expected — took 65% of games against 52% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
N/A
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mark Nash
+0.061better than expected — took 100% of games against 62% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
John Vlahandreas / Jonathan Clark
2026-04-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Connor Franssen
0.010about as expected — took 60% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Jay Brown / David Gutterman
2026-04-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Guo
+0.036better than expected — took 50% of games against 38% expected
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
Michael Beyrouty / Ray Chiou
2026-04-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jesse Aguero
0.006about as expected — took 60% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Jeff Cox / Jonathan Lebe
2026-03-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mark Nash
+0.027better than expected — took 52% of games against 42% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.