Search

Charlotte Ransom

Eugene, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
118 matches · 58W–60L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.16
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 14 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
2%
down to 3.0
98%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Eugene · 3.5
6 of 8
OR · 3.5
571 of 735

Charlotte is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Charlotte has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.52019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Charlotte has gone from the 30th to the 25th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
73.3%
11W–4L · 59.3% of games
3.5
52.1%
25W–23L · 48.5% of games
6.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 54.5% of games
7.0mixed
50%
11W–11L · 48.3% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history118 matches
L
Kim Himstreet / Kevin Semonsenchamps
2026-07-26 · #3 Doubles · with Will Calkin
0.004about as expected — took 35% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
Christina Snyder / Yong Bakoschamps
2026-07-26 · #3 Doubles · with Will Calkin
+0.009about as expected — took 32% of games against 34% expected
6-1, 7-5
L
Amy Graham / Dennis Mooremixed
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Heyen
+0.000better than expected — took 33% of games against 16% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Christina Snyder / Yong Bakosmixed
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Jordan
+0.000below expectation — took 8% of games against 33% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Kelly Greer / Gary Wheelermixed
2026-07-25 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Jordan
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Dianne Tanselli / Mark Kaenelmixed
2026-07-24 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Heyen
+0.000better than expected — took 92% of games against 53% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
Margaret Collier / Jody Schatz
2026-05-31 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan Helfrich
+0.061better than expected — took 72% of games against 43% expected
7-5, 6-0
L
Lizbeth Silva-lopez
2026-05-30 · #1 Singles · 3.5
0.061below expectation — took 8% of games against 43% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
Megan Jensen
2026-05-16 · #2 Singles · 3.5
+0.005about as expected — took 58% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
Jessica Penetar
2026-05-09 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.023better than expected — took 52% of games against 44% expected
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
Jill Schoner / Xiaotong Wangchamps
2026-05-03 · #3 Doubles · with Laurie Leece
+0.026better than expected — took 52% of games against 40% expected
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
Marianne Bradshaw
2026-05-02 · #1 Singles · 3.5
0.036below expectation — took 20% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.