Teams

ESTC-Fireballers

2026 ADULT 40 & Over · 3.5 Women (A40)

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTHERN OREGON

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-05-02vs ACB-Tightly StrungSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJen West / Jennifer Salnas vs Lisa Johannessen / Juli Parlan5-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesPaula Thompson vs Sarah Wuepper6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAngela Hamilton / Cathleen Karcher vs Kim Himstreet / Lucinda Fournier6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesCharlotte Ransom / Krissi Martes vs Helen Silfven / Margaret Collier2-6, 4-6
2026-05-02vs STSC-Stahl/TuckerWon 31
W#1 DoublesAngela Hamilton / Cathleen Karcher vs Kimberley Boman / Jill Ainsworth7-6, 6-3
L#1 SinglesCharlotte Ransom vs Marianne Bradshaw2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSarah Follett / Krissi Martes vs Stephenie Tucker / Maggie Hudson6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTori Waples / Laurie Leece vs Dawn Vlahandreas / Amy Caldwell6-3, 6-1
2026-05-01vs CCTA-NguyenWon 40
W#1 DoublesJennifer Salnas / Jen West vs McKaila Allcorn / Beverly Reed6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesSarah Follett vs Happy Grove6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLaurie Leece / Tori Waples vs Bethany Morris Jenkins / Nicole Clarke6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Bodeen / Paula Thompson vs Elizabeth Smith / Yen Nguyen6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women (A40) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Cathleen Karcher
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.46
Laurie Leece
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.37
Paula Thompson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
Jennifer Salnas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Angela Hamilton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
Tori Waples
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.24
Krissi Martes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Jen West
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Sarah Follett
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.14
Karen Bodeen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Charlotte Ransom
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Krissi Martes + Karen Bodeen5354% games+4.6% vs expected
Paula Thompson + Angela Hamilton4259% games−0.5% vs expected
Paula Thompson + Charlotte Ransom8850% games−1.2% vs expected
Jen West + Jennifer Salnas171853% games−2.2% vs expected
Tori Waples + Angela Hamilton2548% games−4.2% vs expected
Tori Waples + Karen Bodeen1448% games−5.3% vs expected
Paula Thompson + Laurie Leece5260% gamesnot enough data
Paula Thompson + Tori Waples404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cathleen Karcher
41W–38L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.46
Laurie Leece
23W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Paula Thompson
126W–77L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Jennifer Salnas
37W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Angela Hamilton
35W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Tori Waples
64W–46L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Krissi Martes
62W–54L career · 6 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Jen West
49W–38L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.19
Sarah Follett
50W–39L career · 2 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.16
3.5
Karen Bodeen
84W–51L career · 1 line in 2026
15%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Charlotte Ransom
59W–60L career · 2 lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
3.02

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.