Search

Andrew Osborne

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
57 matches · 39W–18L · seasons 20192026
Where Andrew sits
73
2.5
775
3.0
1278
3.5
930
4.0
419
4.5
77
5.0

Andrew is one of 930 men at 4.0 in this cohort of 3552. Levels at or below 4.0 account for 86% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Andrew has been a steady 4.0 across all 7 seasons on record.

3.54.02019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2019, 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Andrew has gone from the 80th to the 88th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
4.0
68.4%
26W–12L · 57.6% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history57 matches
W
2026-01-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Russin
+0.001about as expected — took 65% of games against 61% expected
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
Irfan Zobayed / Anthony Tranchamps
2025-10-11 · #2 Doubles · with Chris Andrews
+0.005about as expected — took 41% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
Gabe Stine / Alan Kesslerchamps
2025-10-11 · #3 Doubles · with William Hall
+0.002about as expected — took 58% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
Jerrod Hastings / Chad Paynechamps
2025-10-10 · #2 Doubles · with Chris Andrews
+0.001about as expected — took 52% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
Andrew Vo / Salvatore DeMurochamps
2025-10-10 · #2 Doubles · with William Hall
0.009about as expected — took 52% of games against 57% expected
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
Jon Eschrich / Geoff Smithchamps
2025-08-23 · #1 Doubles · with Jourdan Radloff
+0.009better than expected — took 71% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2025-08-23 · #1 Doubles · with Jourdan Radloff
0.022below expectation — took 45% of games against 54% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-08-22 · #1 Doubles · with Jourdan Radloff
0.026below expectation — took 58% of games against 66% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-08-09 · #3 Doubles · with Chris Andrews
+0.004better than expected — took 75% of games against 66% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Kaden Baker / David Chihorekchamps
2025-08-08 · #3 Doubles · with Chris Andrews
+0.029better than expected — took 71% of games against 55% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
2025-05-23 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jourdan Radloff
+0.008better than expected — took 65% of games against 59% expected
7-6, 6-1
W
James Xu / Abraham Ahn
2025-05-16 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jourdan Radloff
+0.012better than expected — took 67% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.