← Search

Kevin Carrigan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
CENTRAL POINT, OR
4.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
50 matches · 27W–23L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history50 matches
L
2026-10-04 · ATFC-Launder/Carrigan · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Denise Poisson mixed
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-10-03 · ATFC-Launder/Carrigan · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Denise Poisson mixed
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-02 · ATFC-Launder/Carrigan · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Denise Poisson mixed
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-09-28 · ATFC SO-Deuce Bags · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Denise Poisson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-09-27 · ATFC SO-Deuce Bags · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Denise Poisson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-09-27 · ATFC SO-Deuce Bags · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christie Chiang mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-09-26 · ATFC SO-Deuce Bags · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Denise Poisson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2024-08-09 · S OR-ATFC-Dix · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hugo Sanchez championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2024-08-09 · S OR-ATFC-Dix · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hugo Sanchez championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2024-06-09 · S OR-ATFC-Dix · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hugo Sanchez
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2024-04-21 · S OR-ATFC-Dix · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hugo Sanchez
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2024-04-13 · S OR-ATFC-Dix · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hal Borg
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
45.5%
5W–6L · 47% of games
8.0mixed
57.9%
11W–8L · 53.1% of games
9.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 47.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
21 matches
Singles
30%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King