Search

Yvonne Klopfenstein

Clinton, WA
3.5S year-end 2025
80 matches · 38W–42L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.05
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 8 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
27%
down to 3.0
73%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 16% down · 84% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.08. Higher than today’s 3.05 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 3.5
1169 of 1209

Yvonne is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Yvonne has been 3.5 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.03.520192020202120222026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Yvonne has gone from the 56th to the 0th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
50%
4W–4L · 52.9% of games
3.5
39.1%
9W–14L · 47.2% of games
6.0
66.7%
10W–5L · 61.7% of games
7.0
25%
1W–3L · 37.8% of games
6.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 54.2% of games
7.0mixed
40.9%
9W–13L · 45.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history80 matches
L
Lori Beehner / Lauren Getty
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Evelyn Wong
0.065below expectation — took 0% of games against 39% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Evelyn Wong
0.012below expectation — took 25% of games against 36% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cynthia Kim
0.010below expectation — took 20% of games against 33% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-05-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ann Swiftney
0.028below expectation — took 29% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Jing Li / Merri Baldwin
2026-04-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cynthia Kim
0.011below expectation — took 25% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-04-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ann Swiftney
0.027below expectation — took 25% of games against 41% expected
6-0, 6-4
L
Merri Baldwin / Gabi Ifrim
2025-10-25 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eden Goldbloom
0.018below expectation — took 35% of games against 45% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
2025-09-28 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eden Goldbloom
0.031below expectation — took 29% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Vietlong Le / Michelle Phammixed
2022-10-22 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hilario Koyama
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2022-10-22 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lori Nelson
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2022-09-24 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hilario Koyama
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2022-09-17 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jessica Price
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.