← Search

Andrew Tran

Seattle, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
67 matches · 49W–18L · seasons 2022–2026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

4.11
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 11 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
9%
down to 4.0
91%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0
Projected to December: 6% down · 94% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 4.12. Higher than today’s 4.11 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 4.5
51 of 103
WA · 4.5
165 of 364

Andrew is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Andrew has played at 4.0, 4.5 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.54.04.520222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Andrew has gone from the 85th to the 63rd percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
4.0
88.9%
24W–3L · 62.9% of games
4.5
50%
9W–9L · 51.6% of games
8.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 42.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history67 matches
L
2026-07-29 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Percy Pan
−0.015below expectation — took 25% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Jacob Mann / Bruno Diaz Torres
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Xinda Lin
−0.043below expectation — took 35% of games against 55% expected
6-1, 7-6
L
Brandon Nakata / Aditya Iyer
2026-07-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Percy Pan
−0.035below expectation — took 48% of games against 61% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
Miles Lander / Will Havnaerchamps
2026-06-21 · #3 Doubles · with Ajay Qi
+0.021better than expected — took 53% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with OLIVER LEI
+0.033better than expected — took 59% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
John Gallelli / Marco del Rosario
2026-05-29 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with OLIVER LEI
−0.002about as expected — took 61% of games against 60% expected
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
Conor Doane / Lyle Li
2026-05-17 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with OLIVER LEI
+0.007better than expected — took 71% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-08 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with OLIVER LEI
+0.036better than expected — took 59% of games against 43% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Charles Hodge
−0.014about as expected — took 58% of games against 62% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Nicholas Aguirre / Tue Khuc
2026-04-19 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Charles Hodge
+0.014better than expected — took 67% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Frederick Huyan / Nishad Krishnan
2026-03-27 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with OLIVER LEI
+0.030better than expected — took 59% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
Peter Kosten / Bryant Pham
2025-05-16 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Curtis Lan
−0.010below expectation — took 29% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.