Search

Michelle Boucher

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
85 matches · 45W–40L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.86
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 6 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
96%
stay 3.0
4%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 99% stay · 1% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.81. Lower than today’s 2.86 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.0
168 of 357
OR · 3.0
283 of 600

Michelle is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams52 teams · 2007–2026
IRV-Townsend
2026 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Women
2026
IRV-Cooke/Selis
2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women
2026
N OR-IRV-Harrington
2025 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women
2025
N OR-IRV-Plowman
2025 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Women
2025
IRV-Townsend
2025 Mixed 55 & Over · 6.0 Mixed
2025
IRV-Duval/Quisling
2025 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women
2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Michelle has been 3.0 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.02019202020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Michelle has gone from the 55th to the 64th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
48.5%
16W–17L · 50.3% of games
6.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 63.4% of games
6.0mixed
50%
18W–18L · 51.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history85 matches
W
Heidi Funke / Lisa Johnston-Smith
2026-02-27 · IRV-Cooke/Selis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ashley Bevan
0.013below expectation — took 45% of games against 53% expected
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-06 · IRV-Cooke/Selis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erica Coughlin-Glaser
0.062below expectation — took 14% of games against 48% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
Anabel Capalbo / Kathleen Coughran
2026-01-03 · IRV-Cooke/Selis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kate Sullivan
+0.007better than expected — took 67% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-12-06 · IRV-Cooke/Selis · #2 Doubles · with Heather Selis
0.005about as expected — took 47% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
Melissa Bothne / Yumi MacDonald
2025-11-23 · IRV-Townsend · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Erica Coughlin-Glaser
0.031below expectation — took 43% of games against 57% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
Minhhang Tran / Cara Partch
2025-11-16 · IRV-Townsend · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Denise Townsend
0.037below expectation — took 67% of games against 74% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-08-23 · IRV-Duval/Quisling · #3 Doubles · with Sarie Crothers
+0.031better than expected — took 65% of games against 49% expected
6-1, 7-6
L
2025-06-22 · IRV-Duval/Quisling · #2 Doubles · with Tracy Laidley
+0.003about as expected — took 37% of games against 38% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-06-21 · IRV-Duval/Quisling · #2 Doubles · with Lucia Parker
0.013below expectation — took 33% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-06-20 · IRV-Duval/Quisling · #1 Doubles · with Brooke Kuerbis
+0.054better than expected — took 100% of games against 64% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Chana Dolbey / Alisa Rakoz
2025-06-07 · IRV-Duval/Quisling · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathy Cooke
0.028below expectation — took 33% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
N/Amixed
2025-05-18 · IRV-Townsend · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bryan Potter
+0.000better than expected — took 100% of games against 35% expected
6-0, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.