← Search

Michelle Boucher

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
85 matches · 45W–40L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Michelle Boucher to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history85 matches
W
2026-02-27 · IRV-Cooke/Selis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ashley Bevan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-06 · IRV-Cooke/Selis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erica Coughlin-Glaser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-01-03 · IRV-Cooke/Selis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kate Sullivan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-12-06 · #2 Doubles · with Heather Selis championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-11-23 · IRV-Townsend · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Erica Coughlin-Glaser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2025-11-16 · IRV-Townsend · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Denise Townsend
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-08-23 · #3 Doubles · with Sarie Crothers championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2025-06-22 · #2 Doubles · with Tracy Laidley championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-06-21 · #2 Doubles · with Lucia Parker championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Brooke Kuerbis championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-06-07 · IRV-Duval/Quisling · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathy Cooke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
N/A
2025-05-18 · IRV-Townsend · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bryan Potter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams53 teams · 2007–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
48.5%
16W–17L · 50.3% of games
6.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 63.4% of games
6.0mixed
50%
18W–18L · 51.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 48% of the time
#2 Doubles
48%
41 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
19 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer