SHC-Cumming

2026 Adult 65 & Over · 6.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

Scouting

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.80

Doug Cumming

usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3

2.76

Michael Siebers

usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3

2.75

Jim George

usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3

2.73

Scott Havens

usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3

2.70

Pete Baughman

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3

2.67

Kerry Sweet

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3

2.62

Chuck Gray

usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3

2.57

William Place

usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3

2.52

Larry Butrick

usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3

—

LAWRENCE HIPSHMAN

usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 0

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

Doug Cumming

27W–25L career

0%99%1%

2.80

Michael Siebers

20W–40L career · type S

6%91%4%

2.76

Jim George

30W–21L career

3%95%2%

2.75

Scott Havens

4W–10L career

6%92%2%

2.73

Pete Baughman

13W–16L career · type S

8%91%1%

2.70

Kerry Sweet

31W–63L career

4%96%0%

2.67

Chuck Gray

4W–12L career · type S

18%81%1%

2.62

William Place

31W–50L career

20%80%0%

2.57

Larry Butrick

47W–55L career

33%67%0%

2.52

LAWRENCE HIPSHMAN

2W–15L career

not enough data

—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.