Search

Matthew Berge

Woodinville, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
200 matches · 88W–112L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.89
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 10 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
92%
stay 3.0
8%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 98% stay · 2% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.83. Lower than today’s 2.89 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Woodinville · 3.0
10 of 14
WA · 3.0
456 of 755

Matthew is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Matthew has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 6.0, Matthew has gone from the 14th to the 58th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
0.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
61.5%
16W–10L · 54.9% of games
3.5
20%
4W–16L · 40.1% of games
6.0
48.8%
39W–41L · 50.9% of games
7.0
41.5%
22W–31L · 47.2% of games
6.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 42.1% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 41.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history200 matches
W
Greg Abbott / Doug Chapman
2026-06-08 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Crisman
+0.048better than expected — took 86% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
Jim Stanfill / Mark Greenlaw
2026-05-20 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mike Gilkey
+0.029better than expected — took 71% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Terry Coe / Mike Otto
2026-05-14 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carter Hicks
+0.021better than expected — took 41% of games against 35% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-04-16 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with ZongJian Xiang
+0.017better than expected — took 59% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
Kenneth Kodama / Wayne Lau
2026-04-14 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with ZongJian Xiang
+0.007about as expected — took 53% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
L
John Tippett / Jans Iversonchamps
2025-12-07 · #3 Doubles · with Patrick Lawrence
0.030below expectation — took 25% of games against 42% expected
6-0, 6-4
L
James Modie / Jef St de Lore
2025-11-09 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with ZongJian Xiang
+0.007about as expected — took 50% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
Jeff Mcdowell / Thomas O'Rourke
2025-10-26 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with ZongJian Xiang
0.030below expectation — took 43% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
Thomas Walker / Ziran Lin
2025-10-19 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with ZongJian Xiang
+0.013better than expected — took 46% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
Brad Smith / David Robinson
2025-09-27 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with ZongJian Xiang
+0.054better than expected — took 63% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
MARK MILLER / Jon Bonnellechamps
2025-09-13 · #2 Doubles · with Noel Balantac
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-1, 6-3
W
Jerry Isen / Brian Nelson
2025-06-12 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Noel Balantac
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-3, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.