← Search

Mike Otto

Bellevue, WA
3.0A year-end 2024
65 matches · 45W–20L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.74
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 4 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
100%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Bellevue · 3.0
72 of 82
WA · 3.0
814 of 960

Mike is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
How you rank at your level
At 6.0, Mike has gone from the 76th to the 65th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
6.0
68.4%
26W–12L · 57.4% of games
7.0
50%
5W–5L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history65 matches
W
2026-05-21 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Terry Dodd
+0.003about as expected — took 40% of games against 43% expected
0-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
Carter Hicks / Matthew Berge
2026-05-14 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Terry Coe
−0.005about as expected — took 59% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-05-06 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Garold Jang
−0.009below expectation — took 29% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-23 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Terry Coe
+0.001about as expected — took 44% of games against 46% expected
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2024-06-13 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Steve Cissell
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-3, 6-1
W
Joseph Mecca / MICHAEL LYNG
2024-05-07 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Steve Cissell
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-2, 6-1
W
Kim Gould / Peter Mason
2024-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Garold Jang
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
7-5, 6-1
W
Jim Stanfill / Steve Fields
2024-04-18 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Laible
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-1, 6-0
L
2023-11-10 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bill McKenzie
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
Manuel Moises / Kent Rice
2023-10-29 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with George Weiss
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-4, 6-1
L
2023-10-21 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bill McKenzie
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-1, 6-3
W
2022-11-13 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Yury Uzhansky
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.