Search

Jon Bonnelle

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
48 matches · 28W–20L · seasons 20252026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.05
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 24 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
26%
stay 3.0
74%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 70% stay · 30% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.96. Lower than today’s 3.05 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
46 of 213
WA · 3.0
176 of 960

Jon is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jon has been a steady 3.0 across all 2 seasons on record.

2.53.020252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Jon has gone from the 63rd to the 22nd percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 53.2% of games
3.5
50%
5W–5L · 48.9% of games
6.0
76.9%
10W–3L · 62.7% of games
7.0
58.3%
7W–5L · 46.4% of games
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history48 matches
L
Sara Burgess / Manav Desaimixed
2026-07-24 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Annelliott Willis
+0.000below expectation — took 35% of games against 61% expected
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-07-19 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Annelliott Willis
+0.000below expectation — took 44% of games against 54% expected
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-06-19 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Annelliott Willis
+0.000about as expected — took 41% of games against 44% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
Donald Gerard / Anirudha Desai
2026-02-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Manuel Sugawara
0.049below expectation — took 29% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Surya Potturu / Gavarraju Nanduri
2026-02-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Howard Shalinsky
+0.022better than expected — took 59% of games against 48% expected
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Daniel Stark / Karen Aleksanyan
2026-02-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephen Daniel
0.004about as expected — took 59% of games against 59% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-02-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Howard Shalinsky
0.008about as expected — took 56% of games against 58% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Mohinder Singh Atwal / David Zhao
2026-01-31 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ivan Hernandez Serrano
+0.005about as expected — took 40% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-01-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicholas Maddock
0.011below expectation — took 41% of games against 47% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
Xiaohu Liu / Jeremy Collins
2026-01-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Huai-Ping Lee
+0.026better than expected — took 75% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-01-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Howard Shalinsky
+0.001about as expected — took 32% of games against 36% expected
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-01-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicholas Maddock
0.010below expectation — took 37% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.