← Search

Teresa McDonald

Boise, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
305 matches · 153W–152L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Teresa McDonald to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history305 matches
W
2026-09-01 · Tie Breakers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sherry Hamilton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-27 · Tie Breakers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janet Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-08-26 · Tie Breakers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sherry Hamilton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-08-18 · Tie Breakers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michele Inghram
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-08-13 · Tie Breakers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sherry Hamilton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-08-08 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
Gelyn Pauly
2026-08-07 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-04 · Tie Breakers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sherry Hamilton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-08-02 · #1 Doubles · with Shawna Byington championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · with Shawna Byington championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · with Susan Riley championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-29 · Midcourt Crisis · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shawna Byington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
71.1%
64W–26L · 58.9% of games
4.0
26.7%
20W–55L · 40.8% of games
7.0
60.7%
17W–11L · 57% of games
7.0mixed
54.8%
23W–19L · 52.3% of games
7.5mixed
31.2%
5W–11L · 46.8% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 30% of the time
#3 Doubles
30%
90 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
60 matches
#2 Singles
18%
54 matches
#1 Singles
17%
51 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
50 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer