Teams

I'M YOUR HUCKLEBERRY

2026 ITA MIXED DOUBLES - IDAHO FALLS · Mixed 5.5 - FALL MIXED

12 players · average NTRP 2.75 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-26vs Mixed BerriesWon 30
W#1 DoublesTera Craig / Patrick Trimp vs Laura Ivie / Brad Vande Kamp6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLyka Aldemita / Charles Stuart vs Debbie Vande Kamp / Kent Waddoups6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMandy Hall / David Eisenreich vs Jen Summers / Ray Gordon6-3, 6-0
2026-08-24vs Backhand Ballers FacerWon 30
W#1 DoublesTera Craig / Bob Boozer Jr vs Heidi Southwick / Boyd Southwick6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesKarren Trimp / Eric Anderson vs Sonja Facer / Rod Gilstrap7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMandy Hall / Morris Hall vs Zoe Marshall / Zachary Marshall6-3, 6-2
2026-08-19vs Served Fresh*Won 30
W#1 DoublesRehnaz Karanjia / David Eisenreich vs Rhonda Rohe / Drew Keller6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMandy Hall / Charles Stuart vs Gaelyn Miller / Caleb Hill6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKara Petersen / Bob Boozer Jr vs Linda Hawley / Blaine Johnson7-5, 6-2
2026-08-17vs Mixed BerriesWon 30
W#1 DoublesDavid Eisenreich / Rehnaz Karanjia vs Kent Waddoups / Laura Ivie5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKarren Trimp / Patrick Trimp vs Sarah Mcmahon / Brad Vande Kamp6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLyka Aldemita / Bob Boozer Jr vs Lois Slater / Ray Gordon6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · Mixed 5.5 - FALL MIXED
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Mixed Berries000000
2I'M YOUR HUCKLEBERRY000000
3Backhand Ballers Facer000000
4Served Fresh*000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Morris Hall
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.90
Tera Craig
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Charles Stuart
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.64
Patrick Trimp
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.61
Kara Petersen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.58
David Eisenreich
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.53
Annette Green
published 2.5
2.51
Rehnaz Karanjia
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.39
Karren Trimp
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.24
Bob Boozer Jr
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.21
Mandy Hall
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Lyka Aldemita
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bob Boozer Jr + Mandy Hall5548% games−4.3% vs expected
Mandy Hall + Morris Hall61642% games−12.7% vs expected
Tera Craig + Morris Hall5160% gamesnot enough data
Karren Trimp + Patrick Trimp134 matchesnot enough data
Kara Petersen + Morris Hall314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Morris Hall
155W–134L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%20%80%
3.12
3
Tera Craig
62W–90L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Charles Stuart
49W–33L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.86
2.5
Patrick Trimp
16W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%16%84%
2.64
3
Kara Petersen
52W–59L career · 1 line in 2026
21%79%<1%
2.61
3
David Eisenreich
19W–29L career · 3 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
2.58
2.5
Annette Green
8W–8L career · no lines in 2026
0%42%58%
2.53
Rehnaz Karanjia
8W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%48%52%
2.51
2.5
Karren Trimp
53W–97L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%79%21%
2.39
2.5
Bob Boozer Jr
133W–230L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24
2.5
Mandy Hall
75W–107L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.21
Lyka Aldemita
23W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.