← Search

Ted Wagner

Boise, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
136 matches · 81W–55L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Ted Wagner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history136 matches
W
2026-09-03 · VAMOS · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Gabrielle Bohdel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-27 · VAMOS · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Gabrielle Bohdel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-20 · VAMOS · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Gabrielle Bohdel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-08-04 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Leslie Wagner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-20 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Leslie Wagner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-15 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Leslie Wagner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-08 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Leslie Wagner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-01 · The Finger · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Johns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-06-17 · The Finger · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Pilliod
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-15 · The Finger · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Johns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-06-10 · The Finger · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Johns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-06-08 · The Finger · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Johns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
62.5%
20W–12L · 60.2% of games
3.5
53.5%
23W–20L · 54.6% of games
4.0
50%
5W–5L · 51.1% of games
7.0
100%
7W–0L · 68.3% of games
5.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 47.3% of games
6.0mixed
57.1%
12W–9L · 54.8% of games
6.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 53.9% of games
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 53.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 40% of the time
#1 Singles
40%
54 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
21 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams