← Search

Marie Parkinson

Menan, ID
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
140 matches · 61W–79L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Marie Parkinson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history140 matches
L
2026-08-20 · Barbara Baker · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Irene Rindfleisch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-19 · Barbara Baker · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Melanie Pratt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-08-03 · Barbara Baker · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Aimee Rathburn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-28 · Barbara Baker · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Irene Rindfleisch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-23 · Barbara Baker · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Melanie Pratt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-20 · Barbara Baker · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathy Gwinn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-07-10 · Baker · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Melanie Pratt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-24 · Baker · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kimberly Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-22 · Baker · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kim Janes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
Mandy Hall / Heidi Dillard
2026-06-15 · Baker · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Linda Hawley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-08 · Baker · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Binns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-01 · Baker · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Christi Ball
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
34%
17W–33L · 41.9% of games
6.0
64.2%
34W–19L · 56.4% of games
7.0
7.7%
1W–12L · 28.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
48 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
40 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer